CO129-336 - Governor Nathan & Public Offices - 1906 [11-12] — Page 360

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Sir,

Enclosure 2 (br).

Hongkong, 3rd December, 1908.

355

In answer to the charges preferred against me, I have to reply as follows:-

(a).

Regarding the receipt of a monthly sum of $20 from the Fux On fire, I deny having received any sum of money from this firm, neither have I engaged extra coolies while on No.6 District or at any time. Because entries regarding firm's wages, and coolie labour, are to be found in the books of the said firm, I fail to see how they relate to me.

(b). Neither does the payment of $10 for boat day labour, which I am charged with having received while on No.6 District. The charge is false.

(c). I do not deny having received the hams and beers mentioned, but can honestly say that I did not know who were the donors. While on duty, or away from the house during my leisure hours, such articles have occasionally been left, but I have always been unable to find out from whence they came, as they were left with the boy, no name being given, and no message or letter left. Consequently, I was unable to return them.

(d).

Regarding eggs. I certainly received a quantity of eggs at 10 cents per dozen. On my enquiring the price, a salesman in the Mo Hop shop offered to let me have as many as I wanted without payment. This offer was promptly refused, but I gave him to understand that in the course of a month I used many dozen eggs, and asked his lowest price per dozen. He said 10 cents, and the offer was accepted.

(e). Demanding $40. This charge I also deny and should like more definite information concerning the date and time when the demand was alleged to have been made. At present the charge is very vague, and having no knowledge of it, as it stands it scarcely gives me a fair opportunity to clear myself.

The Honourable

The Colonial Secretary.

Page 360


Page 361

Edit History

2026-06-02 11:40:28 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Sir,Enclosure 2 (br).Hongkong, 3rd December, 1908.355In answer to the charges preferred against me, I have to reply as follows:-(a).Regarding the receipt of a monthly sum of $20 from the Fux On fire, I deny having received any sum of money from this firm, neither have I engaged extra coolies while on No.6 District or at any time. Because entries regarding firm's wages, and coolie labour, are to be found in the books of the said firm, I fail to see how they relate to me.(b). Neither does the payment of $10 for boat day labour, which I am charged with having received while on No.6 District. The charge is false.(c). I do not deny having received the hams and beers mentioned, but can honestly say that I did not know who were the donors. While on duty, or away from the house during my leisure hours, such articles have occasionally been left, but I have always been unable to find out from whence they came, as they were left with the boy, no name being given, and no message or letter left. Consequently, I was unable to return them.(d).Regarding eggs. I certainly received a quantity of eggs at 10 cents per dozen. On my enquiring the price, a salesman in the Mo Hop shop offered to let me have as many as I wanted without payment. This offer was promptly refused, but I gave him to understand that in the course of a month I used many dozen eggs, and asked his lowest price per dozen. He said 10 cents, and the offer was accepted.(e). Demanding $40. This charge I also deny and should like more definite information concerning the date and time when the demand was alleged to have been made. At present the charge is very vague, and having no knowledge of it, as it stands it scarcely gives me a fair opportunity to clear myself.The HonourableThe Colonial Secretary.Page 360Page 361
Baseline (Original)
jJavespa svim del undo at andÁN to nauriwar fiVENEN Aent of suLIPI°) *00Q":A10A4 20 e 10 JetPkec.du" (201,112#(raw) (COPY)Sir,Enclosure 2 (br).Hongkong, 3rd. December, 1908.355PROL DISS)(700 geaoJOU JÄSENYIn answer to the charges preferred against me, i have to reply as follows:-(a).Regarding the receipt of a monthly sue of $20 from the Fux On fire, I deny having raceived any sum of money from this fira, neither have i engaged extra coolies while on No.6 District or at any time. Pecause entries regarding foxis wages, and coolie labour, are to be found in the books of the said fire, I fail to see how they relate to me.(b). Neither does the payment of $10 for boat day labour, which i am charged with having received while on No.P, District. The charge is false.(c). I do not deny having received the hams and beers mentioned, but can honestly say that i did not know before whom were the donors. While on duty, or away from the house during my leisure hours, such articles have occasionally been left, but I have always been unable to find out from whence they care, as they were left with the boy, no nase oeing given, and no message or letter left. Consequently, I was unable to return them.(1).Megarding eggs. I certainly received a quantity of eggs at 10 cents per dosen. Un my enquiring the price, a salesman in the Mo Hop shop offered to let me have as many as I wanted without payment This offer was promptly refused, but I gave his to understand that in1 the course of a month i used many dozen eggs, and asked his lowest price per dozen. ne sail 10 cents, and the offer was accepted.(e). Desanding $40. This charge i also deny and should like more definite information concerning the date and time when the demand was alleged to have been #ade. At present the charge is very vague, and having no knowledge of it, as it stands it scarcely gives me a fail opportunity to clear myself.The Honourable1The Colonial Secretary.Page 360Page 361
2026-06-02 11:40:28 · Baseline
View content

j

Javespa svim del undo at andÁN to nauriwar fi

VENEN Aent of suLIPI°) *00Q":

A

10A4 20 e 10 JetP

kec.du" (201,112

#

(raw) (COPY)

Sir,

Enclosure 2 (br).

Hongkong, 3rd. December, 1908.

355

PROL DISS)

(700 geaoJOU JÄSENY

In answer to the charges preferred against me, i have to

reply as follows:-

(a).

Regarding the receipt of a monthly sue of $20 from the Fux

On fire, I deny having raceived any sum of money from this fira,

neither have i engaged extra coolies while on No.6 District or at any

time. Pecause entries regarding foxis wages, and coolie labour, are

to be found in the books of the said fire, I fail to see how they

relate to me.

(b). Neither does the payment of $10 for boat day labour, which

i am charged with having received while on No.P, District. The charge

is false.

(c). I do not deny having received the hams and beers mentioned,

but can honestly say that i did not know before whom were the donors.

While on duty, or away from the house during my leisure hours, such

articles have occasionally been left, but I have always been unable to

find out from whence they care, as they were left with the boy, no

nase oeing given, and no message or letter left. Consequently, I was

unable to return them.

(1).

Megarding eggs. I certainly received a quantity of eggs

at 10 cents per dosen. Un my enquiring the price, a salesman in the

Mo Hop shop offered to let me have as many as I wanted without payment

This offer was promptly refused, but I gave his to understand that in

1

the course of a month i used many dozen eggs, and asked his lowest

price per dozen. ne sail 10 cents, and the offer was accepted.

(e). Desanding $40. This charge i also deny and should like

more definite information concerning the date and time when the demand

was alleged to have been #ade. At present the charge is very vague,

and having no knowledge of it, as it stands it scarcely gives me a fail

opportunity to clear myself.

The Honourable

1

The Colonial Secretary.

Page 360Page 361

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.